Your engineers bring a real codebase. Ours run Compass on it live for ninety minutes (static complexity, architectural coupling, test verifiability, change risk, AI readiness, in that order). You walk away with a preliminary tech-debt number in dollars per sprint, an AI-readiness score per service, and a clear view of whether a full engagement would be worth scheduling. Not slides about a methodology. The actual tools, on actual code.
Most modernization programs scope the work from architecture diagrams and team interviews. The estimates come out wrong because the diagrams are stale and the interviews reflect what people remember, not what is actually in the code. Compass reads the code directly. In this workshop we run the assessment tooling on a real codebase while you watch, so you can judge for yourself whether the full engagement is worth scheduling.
of modernization programs fail to meet objectives. Assessment is where most go wrong.
assessed live during the workshop. Static complexity, coupling, test verifiability, change risk, AI readiness.
from "we are guessing at the scope" to "we have a number per sprint."
What incomplete scoping costs downstream. The data gap between "we know our codebase" and what's actually in the codebase.
How Compass converts assessment data into dollars per sprint. The number that turns a technical conversation into a funded program.
Apply the five layers to your own codebase. Which services would you assess first? Where do you expect the coupling surprises?
Whether your modernization qualifies for AWS MAP funding. Full Compass engagement scoping if the workshop convinced you.
You've seen five assessment layers run on real code. Static analysis, coupling detection, AI readiness scoring. Not a demo environment. An actual codebase with real complexity.
The methodology that turns "we have tech debt" into dollars per sprint. The number that gets a modernization program funded.
From the facilitated session: which services to assess first, where coupling risk is highest, where AI readiness is closest.
Scope, timeline (2-3 weeks), deliverables, and how Compass connects to Evolve if you go further.
From the engineers who build and run Compass. Not sales reps. The people who wrote the tooling.
Whether your modernization qualifies for AWS MAP funding and how the application process works.
The person who owns the modernization decision and needs hard data to build the business case.
The person who knows the codebase best and can judge whether the assessment findings match reality.
The person whose team will live with the modernization outcome. Needs to see what the tooling does to their codebase, not a slide deck about it.
The person who needs tech debt quantified in dollars and the business case built from data, not estimates.
The architecture diagrams say one thing. The codebase says another. Compass shows you which one is right. Ninety minutes. Live.
Recent results
A platform-engineering modernization combining agentic AI with the data layer. Shipped on AWS with full audit trail.
You'll see the assessment methodology running on a real codebase and decide whether the full engagement is worth your time. No pitch deck. No follow-up unless you ask.
Virtual. Free. Your first conversation is with an engineer, not a sales rep.
AWS Premier Tier Services Partner






Active Competencies and Service Delivery Programs relevant to this offering.